Studi comparativi e di comparabilità di test standardizzati

1. Alderson, J.C. (ed.) (2005), “Language Assessment in Europe”, Language Testing, 22, 3 (special issue), pp. 257-411.

2. Alderson, J.C., Huhta, A. (2005), “The Development of a Suite of Computer-based Diagnostic Tests based on the Common European Framework”, Language Testing, 22, 3, pp. 301-320.

3. Bachmann, L.F., Kunnan, A.J., Vanniarajan, S., Lynnch, B., 1987, "Task and ability as a basis for examining the content and construct comparability of two EFL proficency test batteries", Language Testing 5, 2: 128-159.

4. Bachmann, L.F., Davidson, F., Milanovic, M., 1996, "The use of test method characteristics in the content analysis and design of EFL proficiency tests". Language Testing, 13, 2: 125-150.

5. Bachmann, L.F., Davidson, F., Ryan, K., Choi, I-C., 1994 An investigation into the comparability of two tests of English as a Second Language: The Cambridge-TEOFL Comparability Study. Cambridge University Press.

6. Jamieson, J. (2005), “Trends in Computer-based Second Language Assessment”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 1, pp. 228-242.

7. Scott, C., Erduran, S. (2004), “Learning from International Frameworks for Assessment: EAL Descriptors in Australia and the USA”, Language Testing, 21, 3, pp. 409-431.

8. Weir, C.J. (2005), “Limitations of the Common European Framework for Developing Comparable Examinations and Tests”, Language Testing, 22, 3, pp. 281-300.

e-mail